The issue of terrorism, by definition, seems to be much more complex than the old data attacks (Second World War or the intifada). And if we add to this world a deep fear when a major attack occurs, the result is a weak democracy, that can easily lead to presidentialism or worse, a military dictatorship for the security of the nation. While the issue of terrorism is complex and extremely painful for those who suffer, it is also true that our society must move forward and not falling into individualism or undemocratic regimes in the interests of global security, because the whole community would be terrified and even more, delve into the abandonment of the concept of community and society. Moreover
pragmatists are generally right-wing parties, involving the security and the great value of the company, which seeks to protect life, and ultimately ensuring the free development and public order of society, even if that freedom to develop within a more restricted scope. Finally, guarantees freedom to "normal."
The question is: Does the company must give in to terrorism? or rather what should we do with terrorism and terrorists?
0 comments:
Post a Comment