Representatives (Mistral and Montalva)
Recently in Chile we have been thinking a lot that was supposed truism And in our country long thought to need a strong president, hopefully authoritarian and especially a president to save us in life social misery of many who put their spirit to a person, which sometimes is a mere image.
For this reason, reading today Biography of Eduardo Frei I realized how wrong we were and how ridiculous we are in the way we conceive of democracy.
Eduardo Frei Gabriela Mistral met on a trip east to Madrid where he had just graduated from his law studies, when Gabriela was known, had a lengthy friendship-negotiable legal relations, doctrinal, but mostly love. Perhaps most important (and that sums up what I mean) comes in the farewell speech that does the former President for her at the time of his death in the Senate, Frei says, "had not presented any: just the fear that would not be easy to get to a woman whose fame spread to America. In Mexico, Lazaro Cardenas gave him the highest distinctions to confer an equivalent position, if I remember correctly, the Inspector General of eduacion, in Spain, was visited and was visited regularly by the famous Unamuno and in France, Italy and other nations was received with honor and admiration for the leading figures of thought. She was not one of those glory that was the propaganda, but actually constituted a figure who transcended the boundaries of the country, if not the continent "then masterfully continues" There are artists who seem to know little. Not always related the treatment and the human condition with works of genius. " Gabriela instead constituted meeting Frei for a unique experience: "simple but full of a strange majesty, imposed by the high figure, almost hieratic and his face like stone carving, which to remember the mountains that enclose the North Valley where he was born"
live in Latin America , the melancholy continent, the continent where it is believed that strong men should govern, Gates said 173 years ago as a gold in his better-known "An aristocratic Fronde." We need to understand that the rights and truth are essentially horizontal, human being, that the capabilities are not determined, determined, and finally we can be broad. No large or hard, but wide as "the Mistral "a hard-looking woman, but never wanted to be, a sweet and sensitive soul to the wind, she marked us the way, just as it did after Frei, starting his humility, his mistakes, his greatness of spirit mark him forever, founder of the Chilean time and "my Chilean solution."
Chile is immense, it is more than an elite, is a town ... But I've never known a people, but by an elite that runs the town.
Dedicated to those who live and lived in Madrid,
To those who think in Chile and its people from the ruins in Latin America or the European grandeur
Tuesday, December 6, 2005
Monday, August 8, 2005
Country By Country Average Cup Size
Changes on TV or just coincidence?
a couple of hours ago I had the pleasant opportunity to witness an act rarely takes place in a television program: the confession of a young man named Juan David with his drug problems. He knew
win audiences with its many artists, who had a girlfriend and family behind and a day to day life came down with an arrest for an investigation of micro-trafficking, apparently nothing new under the sun in this society, and truth is that until there seemed to be the downfall of another one, a public figure, but in the end was just one more. Until I win my respect and admiration when he was able to stand after 5 days' imprisonment, of the greatest humiliations newspaper (The Fourth and the latest news) and collective social rejection, before the cameras of the program who shot to fame "Red" (a program that always hated by the rest, because like all the others of their kind, they like playing with the feelings of the participants) but this was different, he went voluntarily to tell his problem, their pain, social disgrace, that well could sink even more, but it was so true, was so emphatic in showing that it was horrible and that is sick, that it actually dignified, and better yet, not made this a farandulezco act, but rather a lesson for all those young people suffering from loneliness, marginalization and fear, could understand it all fall, even bigger, but really the important thing is to stand and serve aggravate the pain caused. Justice was especially diligent and successful in their decision, and Chile's National Television channel proved to be a serious and responsible when it comes to be, faced with a problem that does not look or suffering, just shut up until it bursts. Ojala
be a lesson to the press, all of us that we started to die much more insignificant things than that, a lesson for the authorities to get to know the weakest against the drug and ultimately serve all people of good will that mean that we are human and that before looking at the speck in your neighbor's eye we see the huge beam that we have in ours.
a couple of hours ago I had the pleasant opportunity to witness an act rarely takes place in a television program: the confession of a young man named Juan David with his drug problems. He knew
win audiences with its many artists, who had a girlfriend and family behind and a day to day life came down with an arrest for an investigation of micro-trafficking, apparently nothing new under the sun in this society, and truth is that until there seemed to be the downfall of another one, a public figure, but in the end was just one more. Until I win my respect and admiration when he was able to stand after 5 days' imprisonment, of the greatest humiliations newspaper (The Fourth and the latest news) and collective social rejection, before the cameras of the program who shot to fame "Red" (a program that always hated by the rest, because like all the others of their kind, they like playing with the feelings of the participants) but this was different, he went voluntarily to tell his problem, their pain, social disgrace, that well could sink even more, but it was so true, was so emphatic in showing that it was horrible and that is sick, that it actually dignified, and better yet, not made this a farandulezco act, but rather a lesson for all those young people suffering from loneliness, marginalization and fear, could understand it all fall, even bigger, but really the important thing is to stand and serve aggravate the pain caused. Justice was especially diligent and successful in their decision, and Chile's National Television channel proved to be a serious and responsible when it comes to be, faced with a problem that does not look or suffering, just shut up until it bursts. Ojala
be a lesson to the press, all of us that we started to die much more insignificant things than that, a lesson for the authorities to get to know the weakest against the drug and ultimately serve all people of good will that mean that we are human and that before looking at the speck in your neighbor's eye we see the huge beam that we have in ours.
Sunday, August 7, 2005
Male Masterbationwhy
The intellectual and political policy paper
|
|
I believed important to write about what happened between the presidential candidate, Michelle Bachelet and historian, Alfredo Jocelyn-Holt. Breaking the Impasse contingent and wondering is it really worth insulting a public person from another public forum, even though you do not have the status of "political" as is generally thought to be done?. My answer is yes, it is certain that the candidate can be paper or a simple "media effect", however I can not stop thinking about the lightness of the argument, because it ends with a semi serious conception we have in Chile on institutions, only to reduce public issues to what made the Lord of the picture ... to end the political and paint a world plagued by authoritarianism, may sound strange, but good accounts, if we keep putting the finger at politics and politicians the issue will be irreversible, and heaven confessed caught us back to a second great dictatorship in less than two centuries.
Finally, what remains is back again to remember how much we cost a lot to get a democratic respect for our country, and the cost we understand the game of democracy. Is too large for an "intellectual" but try to put another finger in the wound of democracy (which is on the political side.) I do not justify the mediocrity and false campaigns is simply that some can not but express our discomfort with some hotheads who feel their frustration when day after day and year after year are as they lose power and popularity, and even worse, become more useless ...
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Webcam Detecten Hp Laptop
Fear of terror-ism. Should there
The issue of terrorism, by definition, seems to be much more complex than the old data attacks (Second World War or the intifada). And if we add to this world a deep fear when a major attack occurs, the result is a weak democracy, that can easily lead to presidentialism or worse, a military dictatorship for the security of the nation. While the issue of terrorism is complex and extremely painful for those who suffer, it is also true that our society must move forward and not falling into individualism or undemocratic regimes in the interests of global security, because the whole community would be terrified and even more, delve into the abandonment of the concept of community and society. Moreover
pragmatists are generally right-wing parties, involving the security and the great value of the company, which seeks to protect life, and ultimately ensuring the free development and public order of society, even if that freedom to develop within a more restricted scope. Finally, guarantees freedom to "normal."
The question is: Does the company must give in to terrorism? or rather what should we do with terrorism and terrorists?

The issue of terrorism, by definition, seems to be much more complex than the old data attacks (Second World War or the intifada). And if we add to this world a deep fear when a major attack occurs, the result is a weak democracy, that can easily lead to presidentialism or worse, a military dictatorship for the security of the nation. While the issue of terrorism is complex and extremely painful for those who suffer, it is also true that our society must move forward and not falling into individualism or undemocratic regimes in the interests of global security, because the whole community would be terrified and even more, delve into the abandonment of the concept of community and society. Moreover
pragmatists are generally right-wing parties, involving the security and the great value of the company, which seeks to protect life, and ultimately ensuring the free development and public order of society, even if that freedom to develop within a more restricted scope. Finally, guarantees freedom to "normal."
The question is: Does the company must give in to terrorism? or rather what should we do with terrorism and terrorists?
Saturday, June 25, 2005
How To Install Slate On Drywall
The U-making, and students
I bring to table the discussion about whether the shots are an effective and democratic student pressure, I say this based on making the house our beloved Central U. Chile, which in fairness caused a great stir in the press and public opinion as they had done the other universities who were unemployed.
1 .- This shows that the only way to be heard is through shots or use of violence? 2 .-
violates democracy take U?
Personally I think it is the only way nor the best, I think the leaders of the federations have a great responsibility in this, to create linkages with authorities and mobilizing power or not, so we should first exhaust the dialogue until dialogue of the deaf there to do some act of taking.
And to think that this decision, but I think it is undemocratic, responds to a logic where in this country think that students are irrational and selfish, but also roads and drunk! (Nakever) so always make us see as irresponsible, capricious and demanding rights that are no longer used because they are impossible to fulfill (right to education, article 19 N º 10 of the Constitution). I think we can deal with this rather than trying to be heard in ways most violent and undemocratic, because if the rights are is to be respected and if no claims for their rights of provision is because everyone in this country are blind, deaf and dumb , in addition to selfish because nobody cares that clinics falling apart and nobody cares that education is another good tradable with same rules as an ordinary market with poor quality (with few exceptions) and more over a misunderstood Christian concept, that of the submission, what is that perhaps we should be silent and bow their heads when we move to bring? I think that's not the idea, and the example of Christ reveals that the worst that society can do as a Christian majority is silent because it is cowardly, because it builds community.
PS: sorry for passing values \u200b\u200bbut I thought it important to connect these ideas to explain the outrageous individualism of our society where what happens to the neighbor does not matter.

I bring to table the discussion about whether the shots are an effective and democratic student pressure, I say this based on making the house our beloved Central U. Chile, which in fairness caused a great stir in the press and public opinion as they had done the other universities who were unemployed.
1 .- This shows that the only way to be heard is through shots or use of violence? 2 .-
violates democracy take U?
Personally I think it is the only way nor the best, I think the leaders of the federations have a great responsibility in this, to create linkages with authorities and mobilizing power or not, so we should first exhaust the dialogue until dialogue of the deaf there to do some act of taking.
And to think that this decision, but I think it is undemocratic, responds to a logic where in this country think that students are irrational and selfish, but also roads and drunk! (Nakever) so always make us see as irresponsible, capricious and demanding rights that are no longer used because they are impossible to fulfill (right to education, article 19 N º 10 of the Constitution). I think we can deal with this rather than trying to be heard in ways most violent and undemocratic, because if the rights are is to be respected and if no claims for their rights of provision is because everyone in this country are blind, deaf and dumb , in addition to selfish because nobody cares that clinics falling apart and nobody cares that education is another good tradable with same rules as an ordinary market with poor quality (with few exceptions) and more over a misunderstood Christian concept, that of the submission, what is that perhaps we should be silent and bow their heads when we move to bring? I think that's not the idea, and the example of Christ reveals that the worst that society can do as a Christian majority is silent because it is cowardly, because it builds community.
PS: sorry for passing values \u200b\u200bbut I thought it important to connect these ideas to explain the outrageous individualism of our society where what happens to the neighbor does not matter.
How Long To Wait After Applying Ski Wax
the far left in this country?
Hi, I write this not with the zeal of the ultra hate me, but simply to understand the logic of the extreme left as well as the purposes they serve in society.
I give my opinion as a student who knows the other ultra campus (j. gomez Antumapu miles) and I think not really, and I am so sharply because of a group that advocate violence as a way to achieve things is openly immoral and because if we maximize the behavior only to achieve a society where everyone Hobbes are violating to achieve their personal benefits.
While it is true share equal to the violent environment, it is true that it is the only way to achieve the long-awaited end, on the contrary I think we submitted in a spiral of violence that creates anarchy and democracy and violates the constitution and the fundamental rights of all people. I understand that there are parties that advocate equality as prior to freedom, but we can not understand that playing outside of democracy, because this is the floor where we can all leave on equal terms at least in political and shaped our achievements and failure, finally, there are less violent forms, although are more costly in time and resources, does not violate anyone's human rights and respect all persons equally, a good example of this is the natural law of U.S. liberalism (though slavery still existed, but if we understand ourselves in the context it was almost normal) and a counter-example is the Russian communism, which does not respect the fundamental rights of the oppressed for the sake of the state, which can sometimes be corrupt and murderer (as happened in the Chilean dictatorship)
A comment !
Hi, I write this not with the zeal of the ultra hate me, but simply to understand the logic of the extreme left as well as the purposes they serve in society.
I give my opinion as a student who knows the other ultra campus (j. gomez Antumapu miles) and I think not really, and I am so sharply because of a group that advocate violence as a way to achieve things is openly immoral and because if we maximize the behavior only to achieve a society where everyone Hobbes are violating to achieve their personal benefits.
While it is true share equal to the violent environment, it is true that it is the only way to achieve the long-awaited end, on the contrary I think we submitted in a spiral of violence that creates anarchy and democracy and violates the constitution and the fundamental rights of all people. I understand that there are parties that advocate equality as prior to freedom, but we can not understand that playing outside of democracy, because this is the floor where we can all leave on equal terms at least in political and shaped our achievements and failure, finally, there are less violent forms, although are more costly in time and resources, does not violate anyone's human rights and respect all persons equally, a good example of this is the natural law of U.S. liberalism (though slavery still existed, but if we understand ourselves in the context it was almost normal) and a counter-example is the Russian communism, which does not respect the fundamental rights of the oppressed for the sake of the state, which can sometimes be corrupt and murderer (as happened in the Chilean dictatorship)
A comment !
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)