Saturday, June 25, 2005

How To Install Slate On Drywall

The U-making, and students


I bring to table the discussion about whether the shots are an effective and democratic student pressure, I say this based on making the house our beloved Central U. Chile, which in fairness caused a great stir in the press and public opinion as they had done the other universities who were unemployed.
1 .- This shows that the only way to be heard is through shots or use of violence? 2 .-
violates democracy take U?

Personally I think it is the only way nor the best, I think the leaders of the federations have a great responsibility in this, to create linkages with authorities and mobilizing power or not, so we should first exhaust the dialogue until dialogue of the deaf there to do some act of taking.
And to think that this decision, but I think it is undemocratic, responds to a logic where in this country think that students are irrational and selfish, but also roads and drunk! (Nakever) so always make us see as irresponsible, capricious and demanding rights that are no longer used because they are impossible to fulfill (right to education, article 19 N º 10 of the Constitution). I think we can deal with this rather than trying to be heard in ways most violent and undemocratic, because if the rights are is to be respected and if no claims for their rights of provision is because everyone in this country are blind, deaf and dumb , in addition to selfish because nobody cares that clinics falling apart and nobody cares that education is another good tradable with same rules as an ordinary market with poor quality (with few exceptions) and more over a misunderstood Christian concept, that of the submission, what is that perhaps we should be silent and bow their heads when we move to bring? I think that's not the idea, and the example of Christ reveals that the worst that society can do as a Christian majority is silent because it is cowardly, because it builds community.

PS: sorry for passing values \u200b\u200bbut I thought it important to connect these ideas to explain the outrageous individualism of our society where what happens to the neighbor does not matter.

How Long To Wait After Applying Ski Wax

the far left in this country?

Hi, I write this not with the zeal of the ultra hate me, but simply to understand the logic of the extreme left as well as the purposes they serve in society.
I give my opinion as a student who knows the other ultra campus (j. gomez Antumapu miles) and I think not really, and I am so sharply because of a group that advocate violence as a way to achieve things is openly immoral and because if we maximize the behavior only to achieve a society where everyone Hobbes are violating to achieve their personal benefits.
While it is true share equal to the violent environment, it is true that it is the only way to achieve the long-awaited end, on the contrary I think we submitted in a spiral of violence that creates anarchy and democracy and violates the constitution and the fundamental rights of all people. I understand that there are parties that advocate equality as prior to freedom, but we can not understand that playing outside of democracy, because this is the floor where we can all leave on equal terms at least in political and shaped our achievements and failure, finally, there are less violent forms, although are more costly in time and resources, does not violate anyone's human rights and respect all persons equally, a good example of this is the natural law of U.S. liberalism (though slavery still existed, but if we understand ourselves in the context it was almost normal) and a counter-example is the Russian communism, which does not respect the fundamental rights of the oppressed for the sake of the state, which can sometimes be corrupt and murderer (as happened in the Chilean dictatorship)

A comment !

What Happens To Pandas In Global Warming

hello

welcome to my blog .-